Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 043
Original file (2012 043.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2012-043

 

Honorable, 1.B.17, JKD, Misconduct, RE4
Change Narrative Reason from Misconduct to Hardship
Hardship; RE3H reentry code; MDB SPD code

ADMIN None
CORRECTIONS

 

 

TIS 3 yrs, 9 months, 21 days
Policy Implications None

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged from the Coast Guard Reserve for Misconduct in 2007 due to a pattern of
shirking.

Pursuant to Article 4.B.1 of the Reserve Policy Manual, COMDTINST M1001.28A, commands are required to
“monitor member participation” and “Correct performance deficiencies by timely counseling of members who
are not participating satisfactorily. Commands shall document all counseling in accordance with Preparation
and Submission of Administrative Remarks (CG-3307).” There is no record of the command complying with
these requirements prior to recommiending the applicant for discharge. Additionally, the absence of a discharge

package and supporting documentation regarding notification of the intent to discharge and appropriate due
process being followed is problematic.

The applicant states that the cause of the non-participation stems from the distance of home of record to the

drilling unit. Additionally, the applicant suffered a neck injury and their car was inoperable. Unfortunately, the
applicant was living in an area where there were no other drilling units within the Reasonable Commuting
Distance of 100 miles or 3 hours per the Reserve Policy Manual. A duty reassignment was not an option; this is
why the member requested a transfer to the IRR until they were able to financially support the travel and

physically able to drill satisfactorily. The applicant had served 4 of the 6 years on the enlistment honorably up
until that time.

The Board recommends that the applicant’s record be upgraded to reflect a Discharge with an Honorable
character of service and a Narrative Reason of “Hardship” with SPD code MDB, RE code of RE-3H.

Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Concur with Board. Aforesaid relief
is granted.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 086

    Original file (2012 086.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-086 NAME Ee 3 CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.6, 12.B.18, JKD, Misconduct, RE4 E RELIEF REQUESTED | Upgrade Re code; Upgrade to Honorable Honorable; SPD code: JND. However, pursuant to Article 4.B.1 of the Reserve Policy Manual, COMDTINST M1001.28A, commands are required to “monitor member participation” and “Correct performance deficiencies by timely counseling of members who are not participating satisfactorily. The...

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 051

    Original file (2012 051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commands shall document all counseling in accordance with Preparation and Submission of Administrative Remarks (CG-3307).” There is no record of the command complying with these requirements prior to recommending the applicant for discharge. Additionally, the absence of a discharge package and supporting documentation regarding notification of the intent to discharge and appropriate due process being followed is problematic. Therefore, the Board recommends that the applicant’s record be...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902112

    Original file (MD0902112.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends he should have received a hardship discharge because he could not financially afford traveling to his reserve unit in Amarillo, TX (221 miles) and under USMCR regulations, he is eligible if his reserve unit is more than 150 miles away. The NDRB found no specific eligibility requirement in the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN) for a hardship discharge based on the distance to a member’s reserve unit. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901730

    Original file (MD0901730.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances which led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service includednumerous missed drills, especially once the unit relocated...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012748

    Original file (AR20100012748.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show that the applicant failed to respond to the notification of separation and notification of the administrative separation board hearing. The applicant contends that he could not attend annual drill because of 100% VA Disability rating and 100% Unemployability rating, distance from drill location imposed extreme hardship due to residence outside of the continental United States, Philippine Islands, and the Command was informed. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901266

    Original file (ND0901266.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: REQUESTED, FINANCIAL HARDSHIP Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:NONE Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030731Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20040614Highest Rank/Rate:OSSNLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)14 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 36EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00145

    Original file (MD02-00145.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00145 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011026, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority. The discharge shall change to: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/ Failure to Participate (Reserve not on active duty)(administrative discharge board required but waived); authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213.A documentary discharge review was conducted in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015156

    Original file (AR20060015156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 July 1999, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable. An RE code of 3 indicates that the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001075

    Original file (MD1001075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6213 of the Marine...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082523C070215

    Original file (2002082523C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), item 27 (Reentry Code) be changed to allow his reentry into military service. Although documents associated with his separation action were not in records available to the Board, item 26 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 is “MDB,” and item 27 (Reentry Code) is recorded as “3.” Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned...